LOW vs KO vs SCHD vs NOBL: 5-Year Dividend Growth & Yield-on-Cost Battle

· 3 min read
DividendXray comparison of LOW, KO, SCHD, and NOBL showing dividend growth and yield on cost metrics
LOW, KO, SCHD, and NOBL compared across dividend growth, yield-on-cost expansion, and five-year total return using DividendXray analytics.

Portfolio Overview

In this DividendXray battle, we compare four prominent dividend holdings across income growth, yield-on-cost expansion, and total return performance over a five-year period.

  • LOW represents a dividend growth powerhouse, combining strong income expansion with significant capital appreciation.
  • KO provides defensive stability and reliable income backed by one of the world’s most recognized consumer staple brands.
  • SCHD offers diversified dividend exposure, emphasizing quality companies with efficient income growth.
  • NOBL focuses on dividend aristocrats — companies with long histories of consistently increasing shareholder income.

Each holding brings a different strength to a dividend-focused portfolio, balancing income stability, growth potential, and capital appreciation.

Category Winners

Dividend category winners chart showing LOW leading in dividend CAGR, yield-on-cost growth, and 5-year total return versus KO, SCHD, and NOBL
LOW takes the lead in dividend growth (11.51% CAGR), yield-on-cost improvement, and 5-year price return, outperforming KO, SCHD, and NOBL in category wins.

Looking at the data across dividend CAGR, yield-on-cost growth, and price return, clear category leaders emerge.

In dividend growth, LOW leads the group with a five-year dividend CAGR of 11.51%.

For yield-on-cost growth, LOW again shows the strongest improvement from first to last year, reflecting powerful income compounding relative to the original investment.

In price return, LOW takes the lead with a five-year return of 63.15%, outperforming the other challengers in total appreciation.

The remaining holdings deliver solid performance across categories, but do not secure a category win in this comparison. The results highlight how strong individual dividend growers can outperform diversified income strategies in certain periods.

Yield-on-Cost by Year

Yield on cost growth chart comparing LOW, KO, SCHD, and NOBL over a five-year period
SCHD stands out for income efficiency, reaching approximately 4.90% yield on cost by the end of the five-year window, while all holdings show steady dividend income expansion.

Yield-on-cost measures dividend income relative to the original capital invested. Unlike current yield, it shows how efficiently a holding grows income over time.

Over the five-year window, SCHD stands out with the strongest income efficiency, reaching approximately 4.90% yield on cost by the end of the period.

LOW, KO, and NOBL all demonstrate steady upward income trends as well, reflecting consistent dividend growth across the period. While their growth trajectories are more gradual, compounding effects become more visible over longer time horizons.

For long-term income investors, these distinctions matter. Strong dividend growth combined with disciplined allocation can meaningfully increase income generation — even without adding new capital.

Final Takeaway

There is no single "perfect" dividend holding. Each security reflects a different balance between dividend growth, income stability, and capital appreciation.

This battle shows that LOW currently dominates in dividend growth, yield-on-cost expansion, and price return, highlighting its strength as a dividend growth leader.

Meanwhile, SCHD demonstrates exceptional income efficiency through diversification, while KO and NOBL provide stability and long-term dividend reliability.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on whether your primary goal is maximizing dividend growth, maintaining reliable income, or building a balanced portfolio designed for long-term income compounding.

Get the next DividendXray article

Get notified when a new dividend investing analysis is published.

​

Disclaimer

This article is provided for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered investment, tax, or legal advice. References to specific securities are for illustration and comparison purposes only and are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold any investment. Historical performance, estimates, and projections do not guarantee future results.